Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

How can a Part CAMO organisation, without having a contract with an operator, demonstrate the ability to manage Aircraft Maintenance Programmes (AMPs), when the figure of ‘generics’ in Part CAMO disappears?

The standard does not impose a "basic" or "generic" maintenance program; however, Chapter 1.2 of the CAME should describe how the organisation will develop the AMP. 
The organization must define the means to demonstrate that they are competent for the management that is intended to be carried out. Certain elements, such as the IT tool to manage the AMP, access to applicable technical documentation and/or staff experience in AMP matters, can contribute to achieving this objective.

Can a Party CAMO organization have a generic scope in its approval? For example, ‘sailboats’ without specifying specific models.

Yes, an organization with Part CAMO approval may have a generic scope on its approval certificate (AC-CAMO-P01-F14). However, even if the organisation approval has a generic scope, the continuing airworthiness management exposition (CAME) shall always reflect the specific scope of the organisation; It is therefore recommended that the generic scope of approval should not be excessively broad compared to the scope defined in the CAME.  
Organisations shall request from AESA any change to the scope defined in the approval certificate.

Remote audits

This applies both to remote audits carried out by the competent authority and to audits carried out by organisations on their own suppliers and subcontractors.  
Authorities/organisations that decide to use remote audits should describe the functioning of remote audits in their procedures and should consider at least the following points:

When a CAMO organisation contracts a company for the retention of its data on an “external” server, is this contractual relationship considered as subcontracting?

It is considered subcontracting if it manages the information, the duplication of information, or similar. It would not be subcontracting, if only the rental of equipment or space to store them were contracted, and the control and management of information was the responsibility of CAMO.

For the purposes of the activities included in RD 750/2014, can continued airworthiness be maintained in national centres approved by AESA?

Yes, but only for aircraft included in TAE.AER.GEN.300.  
For the rest of the aircraft included in TAE.AER.GEN.100 and TAE.AER.GEN.200, maintenance must be performed in organizations with EASA certificate (Part 145 or Part CAO).